Nevertheless, she persisted: Mobilization after the Women’s March

Authors

  • Bettina Spencer Saint Mary's College
  • Ernesto Verdeja University of Notre Dame

Abstract

The Women’s March in Washington D.C. had a crowd size of approximately 750,000 people, possibly much higher. Los Angeles, Chicago, New York City and numerous other cities across the United States experienced large and diverse demonstrations. What is particularly noteworthy is both the size of individual demonstrations and the number of demonstrations across the country. With such high levels of participation, and with such an intersectional platform, the Women’s March created an inclusive, large-scale social movement and was an impressive display of political mobilization.

We are interested in whether the participants in the Washington D.C. march were likely to continue to participate in other forms of social mobilization as compared to participants who marched elsewhere, or who did not march at all that day.  We administered a survey to assess whether people who attended the women’s march in D.C. were indeed influenced to participate in more marches, and importantly, for a greater range of causes, than people who attended smaller marches or who did not march at all. We found that our hypotheses were partially supported in that participants did not differ in their level of protest participation before the women’s march.  However, whether participants marched in D.C. or elsewhere did make a significant difference on future intentions; participating in any march that day increased interest in future protests for a wider set of causes.

Keywords: Women’s March, feminism, social movements, activism

 

Author Biographies

Bettina Spencer, Saint Mary's College

I am an Associate Professor of Psychology and Gender and Women's Studies at Saint Mary's College. Research interests include examing how stereotyping and prejudice impact stigmatized groups; the intersection of gender and social class; cross-cultural psychology; dehumanization; and the impact of single-sex environments on college-age women.

Ernesto Verdeja, University of Notre Dame

I am an Associate Professor of Politcal Science and Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame. Research interests include large-scale political violence and mass atrocities, political reconciliation, peace studies and social movements, and contemporary democratic and feminist theory.

References

Chong, D. (1991). Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

Darrow, B. (2017, January). Turns Out Attendance at Women’s March Was Bigger Than

Estimated. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/01/23/womens-march-crowd-estimates/.

DeNardo, J. (1985). Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion.

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2004). Emotional Dimensions of Social Movements.

In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 413–32). Oxford: Blackwell.

Kitts, J. (2000). Socializing in Black Boxes: Social Networks and SMO Participation.

Mobilization, 5, 241-257.

Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social

Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and

Activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 640-667.

Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Opp, K.-D. (1989). The Rationality of Political Protest. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective Identity and Social Movements. Annual Review of

Sociology, 27, 283–305.

Pressman, J., & Chenoweth, E. (2017, January). Crowd Estimates: 1.21.2017. Fortune. Retrieved

from http://fortune.com/2017/01/23/womens-march-crowd-estimates/.

Ramanathan, L. (2017, January). Was the Women’s March Just Another Display of White

Privilege? Some Think So. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2017/01/26/was-women-march-just-another-display-white-privilege-some-think/

Smith, J., & Verdeja, E. (2013). Introduction. In J. Smith and E. Verdeja, (Eds.), Globalization,

Social Movements and Peacebuilding (pp. 1-20). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Wallace, T., & Parlapiano, A. (2017, January). Crowd Scientists Say Women’s March in Washington Had 3 Time as Many People as Trump’s Inauguration. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/22/us/politics/womens-march-trump-crowd-estimates.html

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2017-07-05

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017): Women's March & Trump Part II: Editorial

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
       
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).